Papiri e UML

Di -
Papyrus potrebbe essere un interessante spunto per un tool CCM.

Commenti

Posta un commento

Post popolari in questo blog

Peer reviews catch 60% of the defects...

Di MarcoR -
“Peer reviews catch 60% of the defects.” http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mvz/pub/eworkshop02.pdf All of us have known for a long time that code reviews find defects, and that reviews are cheaper and can be more effective than most kinds of testing. In Code Complete, Steve McConnell builds an overwhelming case for code reviews: disciplined code inspections can find between 45%-70% of all defects in code, while even fast, informal reviews can find 20%-30%. Studies at IBM, HP, Microsoft and other places show that it is several times cheaper to find bugs in code reviews than through testing. And evidence keeps coming in to support that code reviews work. http://www.cc2e.com/
Continua a leggere

17/09 ore 11: Pommmarola 'n coppa...

Di -
Immagine
Mercoledì 17 Settembre - ore 11:00 , solita saletta: A time boxing technique: La Tecnica del Pomodoro - Le slide della presentazione. - Semplici  documenti word, per inziare raccolta dati. - Un comodo timer software ( ZeroTimer ) - One more software timer ( Cool Timer ) ...last but not least, don't forget the Mantra:  The Next Pomodoro Will Go Better!!!
Continua a leggere