Nuovo mapping IDL to C++11 in arrivo!

Di MarcoR -
Se avete pensato che il mapping IDL2C++ fosse un incubo, non siete stati i soli ;-)

E' in arrivo il nuovo mapping IDL verso C++0x (ossia C++11) che promette di semplificare di molto la vita !

Why you should care about IDL to C++0x

Commenti

Unknown ha detto…
Interessante che si sia qualcuno che utilizza CORBA oltre a me :-)
11 settembre 2012 alle ore 11:51
Anonimo ha detto…
Sul mapping C++11 ci stanno lavorando:

http://www.orbzone.org/node/267

prevedono di adottarlo entro 2 anni !
Chi sa dove saremo !

Sul link ci sono anche degli esempi di idl e di codice generato con il nuovo mapping.

MikeMos
26 settembre 2012 alle ore 23:23
Posta un commento

Post popolari in questo blog

JNI? there's someone who remembers something?

Di -
Java Communications Without JNI JNA is an open source project maintained by Tim Wall that allows you to write Java code only to call into native libraries (i.e., DLLs on Windows). Without JNA, you would have to write potentially complex Java Native Interface (JNI) code or other glue code to make this work. For instance, the following code sample from the JNA Wikipedia page works as-is on Windows, Linux, or OS X, to call the native C runtime  printf  function: ? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 import com.sun.jna.Library; import com.sun.jna.Native; import com.sun.jna.Platform;     /** Simple example of native library declaration and usage. */ public class HelloWorld {      public interface CLibrary extends Library {          CLibrary INSTANCE = (CLibrary) Native.loadLibrary(        ...
Continua a leggere

Peer reviews catch 60% of the defects...

Di MarcoR -
“Peer reviews catch 60% of the defects.” http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mvz/pub/eworkshop02.pdf All of us have known for a long time that code reviews find defects, and that reviews are cheaper and can be more effective than most kinds of testing. In Code Complete, Steve McConnell builds an overwhelming case for code reviews: disciplined code inspections can find between 45%-70% of all defects in code, while even fast, informal reviews can find 20%-30%. Studies at IBM, HP, Microsoft and other places show that it is several times cheaper to find bugs in code reviews than through testing. And evidence keeps coming in to support that code reviews work. http://www.cc2e.com/
Continua a leggere